Stop Searching for Documentation Tools – Master Document Clarity Instead!
How to choose the most suitable documentation writing tool? This article explores the core aspects of document readability and fluency, providing optimal documentation strategies for software engineers, project managers, product managers, and system analysts (SA) to enhance efficiency and clarity.
Introduction
In technical documentation writing, choosing the right tool is not the key factor. What truly affects quality is content structure and expression ability.
Many people get caught up in "which documentation tool is best," but in reality, the most suitable one is often the one you're most familiar and comfortable with.
The readability and fluency of technical documentation depend on three key factors:
✅ Content Mastery – The author's understanding of the topic determines the document's clarity.
✅ Logic and Structure – Can readers understand smoothly without being overwhelmed or underwhelmed by information?
✅ Writing Organization Skills – How to explain complex concepts in the most concise way?
When you have 100% understanding of the content and can express it clearly and logically, readers can understand it instantly without needing to double-check details.
The core of documentation writing is not the tool, but whether you can clearly express what you want to say.
During development, the granularity of document content determines development speed, because the devil is in the details.
For example:
Due to ?? policy changes, the marketing department wants to provide OO functionality,
allowing logged-in users to quickly find this feature on the homepage, further enhancing product exposure and conversion rates.
- Feature Flow
1. Post-login Homepage Display
- Add an OO feature entry point (e.g., button or banner) on the post-login homepage,
positioned at [specified area, or adjustable].
- Allow the marketing department to upload marketing copy and recommended products through the backend,
with dynamic content adjustment based on different user types (e.g., new vs. existing customers).
2. Feature Page (Product List)
- After clicking the homepage entry, users enter the Product List page to browse all purchasable products.
- Product information includes: name, image, price, brief description.
- Users can find specific products through category filtering/search (if applicable).
3. Product Details
- After clicking a product, users enter the Product Detail page showing complete product information, including:
- Detailed specifications
- Available quantities and options
- Promotional information (if any)
4. Purchase Flow
- On the product detail page, users click the ZZ button to enter the purchase flow.
- Purchase flow steps include:
- Select quantity and specifications
- Add to cart (or direct checkout)
- Payment method selection and checkout
- Marketing and data recording
- Marketing Content Management: Backend interface needed for marketing department to flexibly publish/unpublish copy and products.
- Data Recording (Behavioral Analysis): Record user dwell time, click counts, purchase conversion rates, with backend reports/data visualization available.
Compared to:
Due to policy changes, the marketing department wants relevant functionality after login for user convenience.
After entering, users can see products, then click to view details, and finally make purchases.
This workflow needs to support different content adjustments and record user behavior for backend data viewing.
The above two versions will affect how quickly technical teams can respond to requirement assessments.
The former indicates that the business unit is very familiar with the expected validation content and business strategy considerations.
The latter only describes the desired outcome, but many details in the process are not mentioned, requiring further alignment on the considerations behind the text.
I believe frequent communication is necessary, but importantly, requirement providers need to clearly know the expected results and whether they align with business strategy.
Alignment is for building better products!
Next, let's look at what to pay attention to when writing documents!
Documentation Writing Myths
If you've tried multiple document management and collaboration tools like Notion, Obsidian, Confluence, Markdown, Google Docs, or Word, and eventually returned to the most familiar tool.
Then you should understand: Tools are just aids; content is the key.
📌 Myth 1: Tools determine document quality?
Many people think switching tools will help them write better documents. But actually, what most affects document quality is the way of expression.
First learn to express logically, whether in verbal communication or written expression, then consider tool selection.
📌 Myth 2: Markdown vs. Word, which is better?
This depends on needs, determined by familiarity, team habits, and document types.
If the team is used to Markdown, then choose Markdown, but if it's mainly business documents, then Word or Google Doc formatting might be more intuitive.
If time is tight and extra time is needed to learn tools, it's not the best choice.
Moreover, even the best tool won't deliver real benefits if the team isn't comfortable using it.
📌 Myth 3: Writing like this should be understandable, right!
Sometimes authors get trapped in their own framework, ignoring that readers might be encountering the content for the first time.
It's like when you just assembled a super cool IKEA cabinet and excitedly tell your friend:
"It's simple! First do this, then that, and you're done!"
But your friend is confused because they don't know what "this" is or which "that" you mean.
To you, all steps seem natural because you just assembled it yourself.
But for first-time readers, they don't have your built-in memory and need more background and details to understand what you understand!
So when writing, don't just think "I get it," but ask from another perspective: If I were seeing this content for the first time, would I really understand it?
The best approach is to have a third party read it after writing, and adjust wording and layout based on their feedback.
If they feel like they're deciphering IKEA instructions, maybe it's time to adjust the wording and layout 😉
After all, good writing isn't just about making yourself feel smooth, but ensuring readers don't have to guess.
Content Mastery: Your Understanding Level Determines Readers' Understanding Level
Have you ever read a document that somehow never made sense no matter how you looked at it? Usually, it's because the author didn't fully understand the content, resulting in documents that are neither clear nor logical.
Often encountered: discovering logical inconsistencies after writing, because document structure wasn't planned beforehand.
Sometimes, writing details unrelated to the topic makes it easier for readers to lose direction.
Or unclear subject, object, and predicate expressions make it impossible for readers to understand complete sentences.
So how to improve content mastery?
Writing often isn't the most time-consuming part; organizing and structuring content sequence takes the most time.
Before starting to write documents, organize your thoughts first to ensure clear logic.
If you can explain concepts in simple terms, that means you can use the most accessible expression to help readers truly understand.
Think from the reader's perspective - your readers might be unfamiliar with this topic, what information do they need?
Writing Organization Skills: The Key to Making Readers "Get It Instantly"
Good documents should let readers grasp the key points at a glance, rather than requiring back-and-forth reading and repeated confirmation.
I most commonly use several methods to improve writing organization skills.
✅ Use short sentences – The longer the sentence, the easier it is for readers to get lost.
✅ Appropriate paragraphs – Don't exceed 5 lines per paragraph to make content more readable.
✅ Add table of contents and subheadings – Help readers quickly find information instead of making them read from start to finish.
✅ Include tables or comparisons – Let readers quickly scan instead of reading large blocks of text.
✅ Combine text and images – Images are humanity's best friend. If one image can be more effective than 500 words, use charts to assist explanation for clearer expression.
✅ Explain terminology: Different professions have different technical terms. When writing documents, assume readers might be people without relevant experience, so the document can be effectively inherited and used.
✅ Maintain consistency: Document format, language style, and terminology should be unified to avoid reader confusion.
Detail Granularity: How Much Is Just Right?
Many people encounter a problem when writing documents: "Should this detail be included?"
If written too simply, readers might have many questions; but if written too detailed, the document becomes lengthy and hard to read.
Before writing, I first confirm who the potential readers are, adjusting detail levels for different readers,
Technical personnel need finer technical details, while business teams are more concerned with business strategy and processes.
Conclusion
When choosing documentation writing tools, the most important thing is not the tool itself, but how to use it.
When you can clearly express logic and organize well-structured content, then regardless of which tool you use, your documents will help readers understand quickly and improve work efficiency.
Every tool has its advantages, but the core remains document structure, content clarity, and appropriate audience.
Only by improving readability and helping readers find information faster can you truly improve work efficiency!
If readers want to discuss content writing further, feel free to contact us! 😇
Email: